Digital.Maag Repository

Effects of environmental cross-over on inflammation-induced nociception

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Armentrout, Jillian en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2014-12-12T17:27:55Z
dc.date.accessioned 2019-09-08T02:52:51Z
dc.date.available 2014-12-12T17:27:55Z
dc.date.available 2019-09-08T02:52:51Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier 896879548 en_US
dc.identifier.other b21497436 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1989/11412
dc.description vii, 52 leaves : illustrations ; 29 cm. en_US
dc.description.abstract There are many studies in which environmental enrichment (EE) has focused on modifying animal behavior leading to improved cognitive functions, such as learning and memory. There are also increasing numbers on how EE positively affects a subject's pain tolerance by increasing thresholds. In order to better understand how an environment can affect nociceptive behaviors, this study looked at the effects of cross-over from one environment to another after induced inflammation. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were initially randomly assigned three to a cage; four of the cages were standard, only containing bedding and food/water, while the other four cages were supplemented with toys (enriched). Baseline behavioral measurements, paw thickness, paw withdrawal latency (PWL) and paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) were collected. After five weeks, CFA was injected into the left hind paw of all 24 rats and the cross-over was conducted. Two of the initial standard cages stayed standard, while the remaining two standard cages changed to enriched. Two of the initial enriched cages changed to standard, while the remaining two enriched cages stayed enriched. The behavioral measurements were then conducted post CFA at 2 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 28 days, and 35 days. A repeated measures ANOVA was conducted on paw thickness for all four treatment groups (standard-standard, standard-enriched, enriched-standard, enriched-enriched) at baseline, 2 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 28 days, and 35 days post-inflammation. F₁₀.₁₂₅,₄₄=1.403 with no significant difference among home cage treatment groups (p-value = 0.180). There was, however, a significant difference across testing times (2h, 7d, 14d, etc.; p-value < 0.001) and F₃.₄₈₅,₄₄=1.403. The repeated measures ANOVA conducted on PWT revealed F₃.₈₀₁,₄₄= 2.520 and no significant difference among the four housing groups (p-value = 0.311). There was a slight significant differe en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Jillian Kay Armentrout. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Master's Theses no. 1465 en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Environmental enrichment (Animal culture)--Nociceptive pain. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Inflammation. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Pain--Animal models. en_US
dc.title Effects of environmental cross-over on inflammation-induced nociception en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital.Maag


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account